A FAIR DEAL FOR THE MOTORIST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
“KHANFUSED OVER PARKING?” - IT’S HIGHWAY ROBBERY! |
|||
In 2016 Sadiq Khan was elected Mayor of London on a bland manifesto
pledging to “Maintain the Congestion Charge at its current level” and tackle
congestion through harmless-sounding measures like encouraging car clubs as a
means of reducing congestion and demand for parking. He would not
have got elected if it had come out with aggressive anti-motorist proposals
like those in his draft Mayor’s
Transport Strategy. |
· BARKING ON PARKING…. The 32 London boroughs are obliged to
support the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, once finalised. As part of ‘traffic reduction strategies’, they will have to consider
‘road user charging’ (read ‘road pricing’, effectively extending the
Congestion Charge) and/or ‘Workplace Parking Levies’ – effectively a tax on
going to work. Although the timeframe indicated is about
2020, remember that Khan has been prepared to bring forward other plans (e.g.
ULEZ). Mayor Khan’s Manifesto
suggested car clubs “as a means of reducing demand for parking”. But he is now stealthily suggesting “the
provision of car clubs for residents when paired with a reduction in the availability
of private parking”. In other words, the aim is a reduction in the supply of private parking. Khan cloyingly
warns that “TfL’s stations and stops will be designed for ...an attractive
public realm (not defined)… rather than car parking and pickup/drop-off
spaces.” As more cycle parking is to be provided, this points to car parking
being made less convenient or even spaces being removed. This is also coded
as: (the) “sustainable choice must be the easiest option every time,
particularly at places where people change between transport modes.” Many drivers were
previously swayed by government propaganda to buy diesel cars as a ‘greener’
motoring option. Although it is the current government’s intention not to
penalise them, Khan is quite keen to take action against diesel vehicles in
London. Measures will include road charging and the imposition of parking
charges/ Levies. Imposing
steeper parking charges would be simply daft, as any vehicle parked with its
engine turned off will not have any emissions! There are also plans to compel ‘car-free’
and ‘car-lite’ housing developments, such as in
‘Opportunity Areas’ where opportunities for parking are reduced or even
denied. |
· OTHER ANTI-MOTORIST POSSIBILITIES INCLUDE This is the third of four
pages outlining the proposals. The first
covers:
The second
covers:
Other proposals and our
positive alternatives are covered on a fourth page.
The above pages provide
information on how to simply object to the proposals. Please object a.s.a.p. and get your friends to do the same. The Mayor and his PC crew are
counting on you doing nothing and just paying up! CLICK
FOR HOW TO OBJECT |
References: MTS
physical pages 30, 40, 43, 44, 60, 102, 138 in the PDF (/151) |
MANY THANKS FOR
YOUR SUPPORT |