A FAIR DEAL FOR THE MOTORIST

 

 

 

 

frank.gif

ROAD PRICING -

BACK FROM THE DEAD?

A QUICK SUMMARY

 

KEY ISSUES AND LINKS

 

Government ambitions

National road pricing is certainly controversial. Previous governments have considered initiatives but dropped plans in the face of public opposition or technical issues.

 

In November 2011, the Government released an ‘independent’ report on the stewardship and financing of major roads in England (‘the Cook report’).

 

Analysis showed that the intention that Government should largely privatise the operation, if not the ownership of England’s Strategic Road Network (SRN), with ministers largely washing their hands. The SRN would be sweated for maximum economic return, with perks for the commercial managers.

 

In its response in May 2012, the government overwhelmingly accepted the report. It identified follow-up actions, such as discussing ‘route based strategies’ to consider and sell the idea of tolling routes that are currently free.

 

This would be a policy shift - see the article on plans for the A14 in Cambs, being discussed at the same time.

 

The Government has also brought in a lorry road user charge, ‘LRUC’. This has been controversial and there is speculation that it will lay the foundations for wider road pricing. The 2012 Budget showed that the Treasury wants more income from drivers.



Other interested parties

The Government is not the only interested party. The EU has a vision of compulsory road pricing for all vehicles on all roads, which it wants to pursue from 2015/6. (This timescale for its Galileo satellite used in vehicle tracking matches that proposed for the LRUC).

 

The EU also seeks to manage major routes as a ‘Trans European Network’ under a common approach, and wants a large increase in infrastructure investment to meet economic growth targets. Its own road pricing consultation was launched in August 2012.

The Government has set up a controversial Motorists’ Forum – in the name of representing motorists. However the range of interests represented are commercial, government and lobbyist rather than the voice of Britain’s 33 million motorists, and it amazingly includes a representative of an anti-motorist group.

 

In 2015, the Government passed the Infrastructure Act, turning the Highways Agency into a company (‘Highways England’) with road tolling powers. There is evidence that Government assurances that there are no plans to toll existing roads are looking very thin!

 

 

Wider issues

General issues that may be relevant include:
* public acceptability, social equity and fairness

* propping up stressed public finances,
* the Government’s overall spending priorities,

* addressing congestion,

* avoiding having to build more capacity
* pushing drivers onto public transport to appease that lobby
* whether road user demand is actually increasing

* links with infrastructure expansion (e.g. housing) and population growth

* 'the environment' / carbon emissions,
* population surveillance
* commercial opportunities (e.g. selling travel data, at least at aggregate level),
* rake-offs for vendors of road pricing technology (under the guise of ‘Intelligent Transport Systems’, ITS), something also promoted by the EU.

 

Recommended resources

Alliance of British Drivers (ABD)

National Association Against Tolls (NAAT)

 

 

 

ABD manifesto

Campaign index

 

Justice for over-taxed motorists

 ‘Fair Deal’ home page

 

 

Campaign index

Site map